The persistence of sit-tight governance, often described as “gerontocracy”, among some African leaders continues to raise concern about democratic consolidation across the continent.
Foreign affairs analysts, members of the African diaspora, academics and diplomats say the practice poses structural challenges to democratic transitions, institutional credibility and political renewal in several African states.
They argue that the tendency of some Heads of State and Government to extend their stay in office through constitutional amendments, manipulated elections or weakened institutions undermines the principles of accountability and periodic leadership change.
According to them, sit-tight governance is often marked by tenure elongation, institutional capture and political intimidation, creating conditions that encourage authoritarianism and weaken public trust in democratic systems.
Observers also note that prolonged leadership by ageing political elites limits generational inclusion and constrains opportunities for younger citizens to contribute to governance and policy innovation.
The concern, they say, has renewed calls for stronger safeguards against constitutional manipulation and for collective action to uphold term limits across the continent.
Some respondents pointed to a number of long-serving African leaders, including Cameroon’s President Paul Biya, Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni and Equatorial Guinea’s President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, as prominent examples of extended rule that continues to generate debate over democratic norms.
Others cited recent constitutional changes and electoral outcomes in parts of West and Southern Africa as further evidence of how legal frameworks can be reshaped to prolong incumbency.
They warned that such trends risk normalising tenure extension and weakening the credibility of elections as genuine mechanisms for leadership renewal.
The respondents also expressed concern over the limited effectiveness of regional institutions in addressing the issue.
They criticised the African Union (AU) and regional blocs such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) for what they described as inconsistent enforcement of constitutional order in countries facing prolonged incumbency.
Mr Chibuzo Ubochi, Coordinating Chairman of the Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation (NiDO) Worldwide, urged African leaders to recommit to non-extendable presidential term limits.
Ubochi described sit-tight governance as a troubling pattern driven by constitutional manipulation and weak enforcement mechanisms.
“Sit-tight syndrome corrodes public trust, fuels instability, constrains civic space and often goes hand-in-hand with corruption and human rights abuses,” he said.
According to him, respect for term limits remains one of the strongest indicators of democratic maturity and peaceful political transitions.
He called on the AU and regional bodies to apply political and economic sanctions to unconstitutional tenure extensions, similar to measures imposed following military coups.
“Democracy cannot condemn tanks on the streets while tolerating power grabs carried out through legal manipulation,” Ubochi said.
A foreign affairs commentator, Mr Collins Nweke, underscored the importance of sustained investment in political education and citizen empowerment.
Nweke said sit-tight politics should not be mistaken for stability, describing it instead as gradual state capture.
“Across Africa, leaders win elections and then convert public office into lifetime entitlement through repression, constitutional changes or managed successions,” he said.
He noted that such practices weaken institutions, marginalise citizens and slow development.
An academic, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said stronger civic awareness could help societies resist unconstitutional tenure elongation.
“When citizens are politically informed and organised, sit-tight ambitions lose legitimacy and public support,” he said.
A diplomat also called for reforms to strengthen electoral credibility, including transparent voter registration, open results management systems and credible domestic and international observation.
She advocated structured diaspora participation, fair access for independent candidates and legal frameworks that promote competitive politics.
According to her, leadership legitimacy should derive from merit and popular consent rather than entrenched political advantage.
She added that African states and their international partners should protect pro-democracy activists through human rights monitoring, asylum pathways and emergency visa arrangements.
She stressed that Africa’s sit-tight challenge is not inevitable but stems from deliberate constitutional manipulation and weak enforcement of democratic norms.
“The remedy lies in firm term limits, transparent elections and open political competition,” she said.
She emphasised that the African diaspora remains a critical partner in advocacy, expertise and principled pressure on African and international democratic institutions.
